Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030195AbVJ1Ofy (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:35:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030196AbVJ1Ofy (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:35:54 -0400 Received: from rs1.theo-phys.uni-essen.de ([132.252.73.3]:33255 "EHLO rs1.Theo-Phys.Uni-Essen.DE") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030195AbVJ1Ofy (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:35:54 -0400 Message-Id: <200510281435.QAA18054@next12.theo-phys.uni-essen.de> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 4.2mach_patches v148.2) In-Reply-To: <20051026034235.GB6423@verge.net.au> X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 4.2mach_patches [i386] (Enhance 2.2p3, May 2000) From: Ruediger Oberhage Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:35:36 +0200 To: 325117@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#325117: NFS client problem with kernel 2.6 and SGI IRIX 6.5 cc: Trond Myklebust , Horms , ruediger@theo-phys.uni-essen.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: ruediger@theo-phys.uni-essen.de References: <200510140905.LAA10947@next12.theo-phys.uni-essen.de> <1129314142.8443.13.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <200510191652.SAA13594@next12.theo-phys.uni-essen.de> <1129756421.8971.19.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20051026034235.GB6423@verge.net.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1833 Lines: 48 Hello all! I would like to report/confirm success in solving the problem described after applying the patch below: > > http://client.linux-nfs.org/Linux-2.6.x/2.6.12/linux-2.6.12-43-dirent_fix.dif > > > > This should normally suffice to fix the SGI problem. Yes, it effectively eliminates both type of problems for our/my configuration here - the 'find'-error as well as the 'resources'- error (= OpenOffice 'printer' and Mathematica 'fonts, files, directories etc.). Thus this patch is more effective that the one in KNOPPIX' 4.0 kernel! Thought, you'd like to know. My sincere thanks to all helping out in this, here. As I normally don't read the lists involved, I won't see other problems with nfs and the SGI configuration. Should you feel that testing here could be of any help, then please don't hesitate to ask me about it - I'd like to return the favour granted, if I can. > Thanks, I'll confine subseqent discussion to 325117@bugs.debian.org > as debian packaging issues don't need to be on lkml. This is fine with me - I just wanted to let everyone involved know about the outcome. [This is most probably my last report regarding this 'bug'. Thus you're all going to miss this 'fine tcpdump'-list I promised; that is, unless somebody asks for it :-).] Thanks again, Ruediger Oberhage -- H.-R. Oberhage Mail: Univ. Duisburg-Essen E-Mail: oberhage@Uni-Essen.DE Fachbereich Physik ruediger@Theo-Phys.Uni-Essen.DE Campus Essen, S05 V07 E88 Universitaetsstrasse 5 Phone: {+49|0} 201 / 183-2493 45141 Essen, Germany FAX: {+49|0} 201 / 183-4578 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/