Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750755AbVJ1Xyh (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:54:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750792AbVJ1Xyh (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:54:37 -0400 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:53632 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750755AbVJ1Xyg (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:54:36 -0400 Message-ID: <4362BA30.2020504@pobox.com> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:54:24 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chen, Kenneth W" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe Subject: Re: kernel performance update - 2.6.14 References: <200510282344.j9SNihg27345@unix-os.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <200510282344.j9SNihg27345@unix-os.sc.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 758 Lines: 20 Chen, Kenneth W wrote: > Kernel performance data for 2.6.14 (released yesterday) is updated at: > http://kernel-perf.sourceforge.net > > As expected, results are within run variation compares to 2.6.14-rc5. > No significant deviation found compare to 2.6.14-rc5 Do I read this correctly: according to your benchmarks, fileio-noop and fileio-cfq are down some 20% or more, across all machine configurations, since 2.6.9? In the 4P configuration, dbench-{noop,as} both seem to have regressed as well. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/