Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750905AbVJ2ATL (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:19:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750913AbVJ2ATL (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:19:11 -0400 Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.91]:32528 "EHLO anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750905AbVJ2ATK (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:19:10 -0400 Message-ID: <4362BFFC.9050202@oxley.org> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:19:08 +0100 From: Felix Oxley User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4.1 (Macintosh/20051006) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chen, Kenneth W" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kernel performance update - 2.6.14 References: <200510282344.j9SNihg27345@unix-os.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <200510282344.j9SNihg27345@unix-os.sc.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 873 Lines: 34 Chen, Kenneth W wrote: > Kernel performance data for 2.6.14 (released yesterday) is updated at: > http://kernel-perf.sourceforge.net > > As expected, results are within run variation compares to 2.6.14-rc5. > No significant deviation found compare to 2.6.14-rc5 > There seems to be some regression here: System: 4P Xeon Test:Result Group 8 Metric: 64KB_4_fread Result: +1.9% -15% Kernel: 2.6.14-rc4 vs 2.6.14-rc4-git4 System: 2P Xeon Test:Result Group 7 Metric: ODIRECT Kernel: 2.6.14-rc5 vs 2.6.14-rc5-git3 Summary: Write has increased whereas Read has decreased by 4-5 % Any thoughts? regards, Felix - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/