Message-Id: <200510290029.j9T0TFg27980@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: "'Felix Oxley'" <lkml@oxley.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: kernel performance update - 2.6.14
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:29:15 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: AcXcH2MrkLzAIwbjTqm26hp34lmHHQAABpNQ
In-Reply-To: <4362BFFC.9050202@oxley.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1048
Lines: 35

Felix Oxley wrote on Friday, October 28, 2005 5:19 PM
> Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> > Kernel performance data for 2.6.14 (released yesterday) is updated at:
> > http://kernel-perf.sourceforge.net
> >
> > As expected, results are within run variation compares to 2.6.14-rc5.
> > No significant deviation found compare to 2.6.14-rc5
> >
> 
> There seems to be some regression here:
> 
> System: 4P Xeon
> Test:Result Group 8
> Metric: 64KB_4_fread
> Result:      +1.9%         -15%
> Kernel: 2.6.14-rc4 vs 2.6.14-rc4-git4
> 
> System: 2P Xeon
> Test:Result Group 7
> Metric: ODIRECT
> Kernel: 2.6.14-rc5 vs 2.6.14-rc5-git3
> Summary: Write has increased whereas Read has decreased by 4-5 %
> 
> Any thoughts?

Not on top of my head at the moment. These are iozone workload, we
will investigate these.

- Ken

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/