Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 22:20:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 22:20:49 -0400 Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.157]:37146 "EHLO tisch.mail.mindspring.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 22:20:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel 830 support for agpgart From: Robert Love To: David Weinehall Cc: Christof Efkemann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011003021658.O7800@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <20011002033227.6e047544.efkemann@uni-bremen.de> <1001988137.2780.53.camel@phantasy> <20011002151051.488306ee.efkemann@uni-bremen.de> <1002066345.1003.66.camel@phantasy> <20011003021658.O7800@khan.acc.umu.se> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.14.99+cvs.2001.09.30.08.08 (Preview Release) Date: 02 Oct 2001 22:20:43 -0400 Message-Id: <1002075650.1237.2.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2001-10-02 at 20:16, David Weinehall wrote: > If the only differences between the different cards are the nr of > aperture-sizes and the status-register settings, why not have a struct > which contains all the valid cards, and use a scan-routine?! I suppose we could, and this is a good idea -- although we'd be reapproaching the size of the current implementation which would be theoretically faster, too. There are only 3 possibilities right now (i830, i840, and everything else). Hmm, maybe I will code this nonetheless... -- Robert M. Love rml at ufl.edu rml at tech9.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/