Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751207AbVJ2HBJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 03:01:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751373AbVJ2HBI (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 03:01:08 -0400 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.197]:40074 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751207AbVJ2HBH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 03:01:07 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Qn/wv4JrQjxDW5G2UL/PeYlx+oWp3xix6NZdD7d/ccwqnI+Skv9cbs2eqnyczdCsyepHiNYLQH+fDvknyVNGZ8ULUbwcx4RSGRoO0LAoHneGm+mXUmhx6JQ4sLO2ObqFd7vAj68MRcX4k8Sy5oEoRPVn+7oQf28YXcmgEUHdUEw= Message-ID: <174467f50510290001s6ea2398an@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 15:01:07 +0800 From: Boxer Gnome To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: boot ok,but reboot hang, from 2.6.10 to 2.6.14 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <174467f50510282358o61c5d977u@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <174467f50510280544g5fffdfaeq@mail.gmail.com> <174467f50510281926tfcbcc4bi@mail.gmail.com> <174467f50510282358o61c5d977u@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1572 Lines: 48 Sorry,I typed a little error. the"The 2.6.10-rc1-rc8 was still ok" should is "The 2.6.10-rc1-bk8 was still ok" 2005/10/29, Boxer Gnome : > 2005/10/29, Linus Torvalds : > > > > > > On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Boxer Gnome wrote: > > > > > > I tested the 2.6.10-rc1 and 2.6.10-rc2,the 2.6.10-rc1 rebooted ok,but > > > the 2.6.10-rc2 has that problem. > > > > Thanks. So it's between 2.6.10-rc1 and -rc2. Good. However: > > > > > Then I test the snapshot > > > 2.6.10-rc2-bk1,2.6.10-rc2-bk4,2.6.10-rc2-bk8,they all have this reboot > > > hang. > > > > Actually, you should test 2.6.10-rc1-bk*, not -rc2-bk*. > > > > The "-bkxxx" kernels are not release-candidates, so they are not "before" > > the real release. They are nightly snapshots _after_ the release, so > > 2.6.10-rc2-bk1 is the first snapshot after 2.6.10-rc2. > > > > So you'd be interested in the ones after -rc1, but before -rc2. > > > > Linus > > > OK,I'd tested the 2.6.10-rc1-bk1,2.6.10-rc1-bk6,2.6.10-rc1-bk12,I > found the 2.6.10-rc1-bk1, 2.6.10-rc1-bk6 rebooted ok,but the > 2.6.10-rc1-bk12 has that problem. > > > Then I tested the 2.6.10-rc1-bk8,2.6.10-rc1-bk9,2.6.10-rc1-bk10. > > The 2.6.10-rc1-rc8 was still ok.the 2.6.10-rc1-bk9 began has the > reboot_hang_after_POST. > > Hope this help you. > > Thanks > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/