Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932110AbVJ2Uom (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 16:44:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932148AbVJ2Uom (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 16:44:42 -0400 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.203]:12732 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932110AbVJ2Uom convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 16:44:42 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pMpG979S0f9gSERyHHmgc0t0wOWBZIIj7KTkfzSSE+n1h7NsdKZcWIeP1mnPfaOvUfbdU108rM3jAyyHw+4TsiO6gOWOV8QlCcX2GLH9yjFXnIHZlm7I6pKF7TDjZX9DYGNTfmn7Jzyx9Qq5TFaYiQf/ZY455Kk6BL0YoZIYZh4= Message-ID: <8355959a0510291344o663a2904nd828c90812f4ffb5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 02:14:39 +0530 From: Akula2 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: New (now current development process) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <4d8e3fd30510291026x611aa715pc1a153e706e70bc2@mail.gmail.com> <12c511ca0510291157u5557b6b1x85a47311f0e16436@mail.gmail.com> <20051029195115.GD14039@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1069 Lines: 27 Hi Linus, This is my first mail to the Kernel tree:- > Everything said, I think 2.6.13->14 worked well enough, even if it's hard > to say how well a process works after one release. Considering that 2.6.13 > had the painful PCI changes (you may not have noticed too much, since they > were x86 only) and there were some potentially painful SCSI changes in the > .14 early merges, so it's not like 13->14 was an "easy" release - so the > process certainly _seems_ to be workable. Will you please throw more light on the *painful* PCI & SCSI changees? > I don't think anybody has been really unhappy with this approach? Hmm? honestly, I did download 14 yesterday and made the kernel ready to compile. today I've seen 14git1 patch! Am trying to understand why is it this kind of kernel development model... thanks, Akula - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/