Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932761AbVJ3Gr0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Oct 2005 01:47:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932798AbVJ3Gr0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Oct 2005 01:47:26 -0500 Received: from inti.inf.utfsm.cl ([200.1.21.155]:62096 "EHLO inti.inf.utfsm.cl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932761AbVJ3GrZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Oct 2005 01:47:25 -0500 Message-Id: <200510300228.j9U2SAd3031713@inti.inf.utfsm.cl> To: Linus Torvalds cc: Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [git patches] 2.6.x libata updates In-Reply-To: Message from Linus Torvalds of "Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:37:58 PDT." X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.1; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 17) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 23:28:10 -0300 From: Horst von Brand Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1100 Lines: 23 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > Even so, it's easy, to I'll ask him to test 2.6.14, 2.6.14-git1, and > > (tonight's upcoming) 2.6.14-git2 (with my latest pull included) to see if > > anything breaks. > > Side note: one of the downsides of the new "merge lots of stuff early in > the development series" approach is that the first few daily snapshots end > up being _huge_. How about doing it in several stages at the beginning? I.e., have -git1 after one set of patches (pulling in from somebody, etc), and so on? -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/