Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932067AbVJ3Lg1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Oct 2005 06:36:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932075AbVJ3Lg1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Oct 2005 06:36:27 -0500 Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([129.241.93.19]:36480 "EHLO cassarossa.samfundet.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932067AbVJ3Lg1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Oct 2005 06:36:27 -0500 Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:36:51 +0100 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: bert hubert Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BIND hangs with 2.6.14 Message-ID: <20051030113651.GA1780@uio.no> References: <20051030023557.GA7798@uio.no> <20051030101148.GA18854@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20051030104527.GB32446@uio.no> <20051030110021.GA19680@outpost.ds9a.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051030110021.GA19680@outpost.ds9a.nl> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.14-rc5 on a x86_64 X-Message-Flag: Outlook? --> http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Status=No hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED version=3.0.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1465 Lines: 34 On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 12:00:21PM +0100, bert hubert wrote: > Ok - no further ideas then. I think people would be interested in the strace > you describe as 'garbage'. The strace is a little big (1.5GB), but sure, people can have it if they're interested. OTOH, I just noticed that syslogd shows: Oct 30 09:55:50 cirkus named[13364]: errno2result.c:109: unexpected error: Oct 30 09:55:50 cirkus named[13364]: unable to convert errno to isc_result: 14: Bad address Oct 30 09:55:50 cirkus named[13364]: UDP client handler shutting down due to fatal receive error: unexpected error ...and after that, everything seems to crash and burn. The related strace call is: [pid 13365] recvmsg(22, 0x561329b0, 0) = -1 EFAULT (Bad address) Might this be a BIND bug instead? In that case, why doesn't it show up with 2.6.11.9? I've restarted BIND now without NPTL, to see if it might be thread-related. > Alternatively, give PowerDNS 2.9.19 a try :-) It reads most bind named.conf > files directly, especially if you don't do views, dynamic updates etc. We're not going to change DNS server software anytime soon on our production servers, but thanks for the tip :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/