Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:05:38 +0100
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: ray@madrabbit.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ray-lk@madrabbit.org
Subject: Re: BIND hangs with 2.6.14
Message-ID: <20051030190538.GA25940@uio.no>
References: <20051030023557.GA7798@uio.no> <2c0942db0510301054j64e650efqe416e14fc1e3bff2@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2c0942db0510301054j64e650efqe416e14fc1e3bff2@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1117
Lines: 24

On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:54:37AM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> It seems a not unreasonable assumption that 2.6.13 works okay, or
> there would have been reports of unhappiness (though that is a pure
> assumption). Since it only takes a few hours to get the problem to
> occur, is it feasible to try to bisect the problem space by testing
> some snapshots between 2.6.13 and 2.6.14?

Unfortunately, the machine does quite a bit of other work apart from BIND, so
unless somebody can reproduce this on another machine, it will be a bit
difficult.

I have a run going in valgrind now to see if it can find anything bad about
the pointers in the msg_hdr structure (the structure itself appears to be OK,
judging from my printf-debugging); it's been going for a few hours, so I hope
it will be entering its zombie mode now soon :-)

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/