Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751299AbVJaDOf (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:14:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751301AbVJaDOf (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:14:35 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:58499 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751299AbVJaDOe (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:14:34 -0500 Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:14:02 -0800 From: Paul Jackson To: Al Viro Cc: ak@suse.de, tytso@mit.edu, torvalds@osdl.org, tony.luck@gmail.com, paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: New (now current development process) Message-Id: <20051030191402.669273d5.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20051031001810.GQ7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <4d8e3fd30510291026x611aa715pc1a153e706e70bc2@mail.gmail.com> <20051030213221.GA28020@thunk.org> <200510310145.43663.ak@suse.de> <20051031001810.GQ7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1611 Lines: 38 Al, responding to Andi, > > because you never know whose bugs you're debugging > > (and if the patch that is broken will even make it anywhere) > > > > In short mainline is frozen too long and -mm* is too unstable. > > Besides, -mm is changing so fscking fast that it doesn't build on a lot > of configs most of the time. I think you are exagerating. It builds on most configs most of the time in my experience. If I haven't tried a crosstool rebuild of the several defconfig arch's in a week, I might expect one of the less popular archs to drop out, usually for something so easy even I can figure some sort of fix or workaround. It's tough to get stable kernels if the only kernels people want to test on are stable kernels. Linux is benefiting immensely from its rapid evolution in various directions. Granted - build and boot tested versions of *-mm, just a couple days behind Andrew's patch set releases, would save people of dealing with some of the simply stupid breakage. Is there any corporate Linux supporter able to fund that? Clearing off the simple breakage could help attract the more serious and diverse testing of a wider group of users with various specialized interests. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/