Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751386AbVJaFa5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:30:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932238AbVJaFa5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:30:57 -0500 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:20755 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751386AbVJaFa5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:30:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:30:49 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Greg Banks Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] unexport get_wchan Message-ID: <20051031053049.GC8009@stusta.de> References: <20050131133617.GJ18316@stusta.de> <20050131140400.GA4038@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050131140400.GA4038@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 995 Lines: 30 On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:04:00AM +1100, Greg Banks wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 02:36:17PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > The only user of get_wchan I was able to find is the proc fs - and proc > > can't be built modular. > > > > Is the patch below to remove the export of get_wchan correct or did I > > oversee something? > > I have an oprofile patch queued up which uses get_wchan. Oprofile > can be built modular. What happened with this patch that would use get_wchan? > Greg. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/