Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932323AbVJaH10 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:27:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932325AbVJaH10 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:27:26 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:21893 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932323AbVJaH1Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:27:25 -0500 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:27:14 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Andrew Morton Cc: pj@sgi.com, ak@suse.de, tytso@mit.edu, torvalds@osdl.org, tony.luck@gmail.com, paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: New (now current development process) Message-ID: <20051031072714.GU7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <4d8e3fd30510291026x611aa715pc1a153e706e70bc2@mail.gmail.com> <20051030213221.GA28020@thunk.org> <200510310145.43663.ak@suse.de> <20051031001810.GQ7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20051030191402.669273d5.pj@sgi.com> <20051031033426.GT7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20051030232234.3ebf77c8.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051030232234.3ebf77c8.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2036 Lines: 39 On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:22:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Al Viro wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:14:02PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote: > > > I think you are exagerating. > > > > > > It builds on most configs most of the time in my experience. If I > > > haven't tried a crosstool rebuild of the several defconfig arch's in a > > > week, I might expect one of the less popular archs to drop out, usually > > > for something so easy even I can figure some sort of fix or workaround. > > > > Try allmodconfig for a change... I'm doing that for mainline on a regular > > basis and even that turns into considerable amount of time. I have tried > > that for -mm and had to give up. > > fud. Every -mm release is built with allmodconfig on x86 and on x86_64. > It's also cross-compiled on fat configs for alpha, ppc32, ppc64, sparc64, > arm and ia64. It's booted on x86, x86_64, ppc64 and ia64. Every release. What fud? I stand by my claim - I have tried to do the same thing for -mm and found that I didn't have guts for that; too much work. For mainline I do cross-builds for allmodconfig on a *lot* more targets than what you've mentioned and generally it stays within ~150-200Kb of patches, about half of that being a fix for 8390 mess. _IF_ somebody wants to do that for -mm, yell and you are more than welcome to all infrastructure, except for the cycles on build box I'm using. Incidentally, it is a box at work - my energy bill is high enough as it is, without adding an 8-way 3GHz iamd64 to it... The last time I've attempted that for -mm was this summer; right now mainline is quite enough work, TYVM... Especially since I use the same tree as a staging point for annotations and watch for build regressions both for gcc and sparse. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/