Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932299AbVJaJBI (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 04:01:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932296AbVJaJBI (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 04:01:08 -0500 Received: from mtagate4.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.153]:10125 "EHLO mtagate4.de.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932284AbVJaJBG (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 04:01:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] bluetooth hidp is broken on s390 From: Martin Schwidefsky Reply-To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com To: Al Viro Cc: Marcel Holtmann , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov In-Reply-To: <20051029184758.GL7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20051029110200.GH7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> <1130583949.6428.1.camel@blade> <20051029184758.GL7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:01:00 +0100 Message-Id: <1130749260.5863.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1864 Lines: 47 On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 19:47 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 01:05:49PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > Hi Al, > > > > > Bluetooth HIDP selects INPUT and it really needs it to be > > > there - module depends on input core. And input core is never > > > built on s390... Marked as broken on s390, for now; if somebody > > > has better ideas, feel free to fix it and remove dependency... > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro > > > > basically I think someone should fix the input layer on S390, but I am > > fine with your fix. And since there isn't a Bluetooth device on s390 (yet), we can live with the broken input core for now. Would be nicer if the input layer would work but there are more important things.. > There's a problem with that patch, though ;-/ S390 is never defined by > arch/s390/Kconfig; ARCH_S390 is. From the fast grep it looks like there > is one more place with the same problem: drivers/char/Kconfig has > config HW_CONSOLE > bool > depends on VT && !S390 && !UML > default y > and the second term is always true here. Why do we have that dependency, > anyway, when s390 doesn't include drivers/char/Kconfig at all? .. e.g. this one. I tried to cleanup the Kconfig for s390 once. After the patch has grown over 2000 lines of code I gave up. If you have the feeling that this should be fixed I'll give it another try. At least the issue with ARCH_S390/ARCH_S390X vs. S390/S390_64 should be fixed. -- blue skies, Martin Martin Schwidefsky Linux for zSeries Development & Services IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/