Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964817AbVJaUIK (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:08:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964819AbVJaUIJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:08:09 -0500 Received: from silver.veritas.com ([143.127.12.111]:19788 "EHLO silver.veritas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964817AbVJaUII (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:08:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:07:07 +0000 (GMT) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@goblin.wat.veritas.com To: Ingo Molnar cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@us.ibm.com, sripathi@in.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, oleg@tv-sign.ru Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] RCUify single-thread case of clock_gettime() In-Reply-To: <20051031195425.GA14806@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20051031174416.GA2762@us.ibm.com> <20051031195425.GA14806@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Oct 2005 20:08:08.0263 (UTC) FILETIME=[CFABE570:01C5DE56] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 651 Lines: 17 On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > > Not my area at all, but this looks really dodgy to me, Paul: > > could you explain it further? > > the patch below (included in the -rt tree) is the prerequisite. That's > what Paul's "requires RCU on task_struct" comment refers to. Thanks, Ingo: Sorry, Paul: I missed that it was an -rt patch: Ignore me. Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/