Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 09:19:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 09:19:18 -0400 Received: from traal.softpixel.com ([65.203.88.42]:10248 "HELO softpixel.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 09:19:17 -0400 Message-ID: <30402.205.188.199.21.1002115377@webmail.softpixel.com> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 09:22:57 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: kswapd kernel 2.4.9 From: To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 0.4) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I\'m running kernel 2.4.9 under a DELL 8450 with 8xP-III and 10GB RAM. > Yesterday a run a BIG I/O, and when this process run, my cached goes to 9GB > and the kswapd is using 100% of one cpu after that. did it stay at 100%, or did it ease up slightly afterward? I have noticed a similar problem with ancient kernels (2.0.0) and not quite as ancient one (2.2.19) where certain applications cause all your physical ram to be used, then all the cache. after its all used (for some mystery purpose?) it goes back to normal. maybe my boxes are just flukes though chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/