Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750723AbVKAJ6g (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 04:58:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750722AbVKAJ6g (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 04:58:36 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:24729 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750716AbVKAJ6f (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 04:58:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17255.15408.824123.131620@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:58:08 +1100 From: Paul Mackerras To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH consolidate sys_ptrace In-Reply-To: <20051101051221.GA26017@lst.de> References: <20051101050900.GA25793@lst.de> <20051101051221.GA26017@lst.de> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 901 Lines: 21 Christoph Hellwig writes: > > Some architectures have a too different ptrace so we have to exclude > > them. They continue to keep their implementations. For sh64 I had to > > add a sh64_ptrace wrapper because it does some initialization on the > > first call. For um I removed an ifdefed SUBARCH_PTRACE_SPECIAL block, > > but SUBARCH_PTRACE_SPECIAL isn't defined anywhere in the tree. > > Umm, it might be a good idea to actually send the current patch instead > of the old one. I really should write this text from scratch instead > of copying it :) > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Acked-by: Paul Mackerras - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/