Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 10:31:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 10:31:39 -0400 Received: from embolism.psychosis.com ([216.242.103.100]:42764 "EHLO embolism.psychosis.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 10:31:35 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Dave Cinege Reply-To: dcinege@psychosis.com To: "sebastien.cabaniols" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem uses Linus Torvalds ? Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 10:33:17 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 03 October 2001 8:00, sebastien.cabaniols wrote: > Hello lkml, > > With the availability of XFS,JFS,ext3 and ReiserFS I am a > little > lost and I don't know which one I should use for entreprise > class > servers. I use Reiserfs on everything now, including a 13 drive Fiber Channel SAN with 3 hosts and multiple levels of Software RAID between them. It is as fast as ext2, and in some case much faster. (IE rm 10K+ files in ~2 seconds) FYI I Bonnie 70MB/s on 6 7200rpm drives in RAID 0. (64k blocks) Keeping up with the 'best' reiserfs patch set can be a little bit of a chore. (However it looks like we're coming to the end of that with 2.4.10) Never used ext3. From what I did read about it, it didn't excite me. The others I've yet to see a mature enough version to actually use, and considering Reiserfs, don't see a reason to try them. Dave -- The time is now 22:19 (Totalitarian) - http://www.ccops.org/clock.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/