Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751204AbVKAVKp (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:10:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751220AbVKAVKp (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:10:45 -0500 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:49553 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751204AbVKAVKo (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:10:44 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove fs/jffs2/ioctl.c From: Josh Boyer To: Adrian Bunk Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, jffs-dev@axis.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20051101205119.GY8009@stusta.de> References: <20051101205119.GY8009@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:10:36 -0600 Message-Id: <1130879436.3775.1.camel@windu.rchland.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 524 Lines: 14 On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 21:51 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Is there any reason for keeping fs/jffs2/ioctl.c? I can think of some various things that could be done with it, but that would require time and effort. Unless David or Thomas have an objections, I think it can go. josh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/