Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 12:01:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 12:01:29 -0400 Received: from shell.cyberus.ca ([209.195.95.7]:4792 "EHLO shell.cyberus.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 12:01:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 11:58:57 -0400 (EDT) From: jamal To: Ben Greear cc: Ingo Molnar , , Alexey Kuznetsov , Robert Olsson , Benjamin LaHaise , , Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 In-Reply-To: <3BBB31F4.C223E12E@candelatech.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Ben Greear wrote: > jamal wrote: > > > No. NAPI is for any type of network activities not just for routers or > > sniffers. It works just fine with servers. What do you see in there that > > will make it not work with servers? > > Will NAPI patch, as it sits today, fix all IRQ lockup problems for > all drivers (as Ingo's patch claims to do), or will it just fix > drivers (eepro, tulip) that have been integrated with it? Unfortunately amongst the three of us tulip seemed to be the most common. Robert has a gige intel. So patches appear only for those two drivers. I could write up a document on how to change drivers. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/