Subject: Re: Would I be violating the GPL?
From: Alex Lyashkov <umka@sevcity.net>
To: Giuliano Pochini <pochini@shiny.it>
Cc: alex@alexfisher.me.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@utah-nac.org>,
       Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20051102104916.pochini@shiny.it>
References: <XFMail.20051102104916.pochini@shiny.it>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: SevcityNet
Message-Id: <1130943242.3367.39.camel@berloga.shadowland>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:54:03 +0200
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 596
Lines: 16


> 
> 
> > So despite the fact the driver has been written in c++, it
> > might be possible to write a usable specification.
> 
> Linux 2.6 doesn't accept c++, so you have to rewrite it anyway.
> You should ask them if you can publish your own driver based
> on infos you extract from their driver.
> 
without exeption c++ code can be used at drivers.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/