Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965138AbVKBRQ0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:16:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965139AbVKBRQ0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:16:26 -0500 Received: from [81.2.110.250] ([81.2.110.250]:34724 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965138AbVKBRQZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:16:25 -0500 Subject: Re: [-mm patch] EDAC: remove proc_ent from struct mem_ctl_info From: Alan Cox To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20051102162421.GJ8009@stusta.de> References: <20051024014838.0dd491bb.akpm@osdl.org> <20051102162421.GJ8009@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:44:13 +0000 Message-Id: <1130953454.2432.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 623 Lines: 21 On Mer, 2005-11-02 at 17:24 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > While fixing a compile error with CONFIG_PROC_FS=n in the EDAC code, I > discovered that the proc_ent member of struct mem_ctl_info is only used > in a debug printk. > > Is this patch to remove proc_ent OK? Looks sane to me. > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk Acked-by: Alan Cox - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/