Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964898AbVKCMOA (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:14:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964915AbVKCMOA (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:14:00 -0500 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:38800 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964898AbVKCMN7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:13:59 -0500 Subject: Re: Would I be violating the GPL? From: Alan Cox To: alex@alexfisher.me.uk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <5449aac20511010949x5d96c7e0meee4d76a67a06c01@mail.gmail.com> References: <5449aac20511010949x5d96c7e0meee4d76a67a06c01@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:44:07 +0000 Message-Id: <1131021847.18848.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1885 Lines: 39 On Maw, 2005-11-01 at 17:49 +0000, Alexander Fisher wrote: > Hello. > > A supplier of a PCI mezzanine digital IO card has provided a linux 2.4 > driver as source code. They have provided this code source with a > license stating I won't redistribute it in anyway. > My concern is that if I build this code into a module, I won't be able > to distribute it to customers without violating either the GPL (by not > distributing the source code), or the proprietary source code license > as currently imposed by the supplier. You need to ask a lawyer in the part of the world you plan to do this. The area of law in question is quite murky and at the moment there is no direct linux kernel caselaw of relevance that helps (at least that i know of). I suspect all kernel modules are probably derivative works but I am not a lawyer and when you look at code which is large, shared with other OS's and uses minimal kernel services it gets more complex. For user space it isn't a problem and the kernel specifically clarifies this in the copyright notice so as to avoid confusion or risk. There is a second consideration however - your module will work only with the exact gcc/kernel/options configuration you selected. That makes binary modules problematic anyway as the kernel has an API not an ABI. It would be far better to understand what the suppliers concern is and to see if you can find an amicable way to distribute a GPL driver or even get it into the base kernel that does not cause concerns for the vendor. You may find the linux lab project and other digital I/O cards with open drivers useful in persuading them of course ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/