Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 02:41:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 02:40:55 -0500 Received: from ausmtp02.au.ibm.COM ([202.135.136.105]:56077 "EHLO ausmtp02.au.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 02:40:40 -0500 From: aprasad@in.ibm.com X-Lotus-FromDomain: IBMIN@IBMAU To: bsuparna@in.ibm.com cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 12:25:24 +0530 Subject: Re: Oddness in i_shared_lock and page_table_lock nesting hierarchies ? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Reply-To: aprasad@in.ibm.com X-created: Reply-To created by f03n05e.au.ibm.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >I was looking into the vmm code and trying to work out exactly how to fix >this, and there are > some questions in my mind - mainly a few cases (involving multiple vma >updates) which > I'm not sure about the cleanest way to tackle. > But before I bother anyone with those, I thought I ought to go through >the earlier discussions > that you had while coming up with what the fix should be. Maybe you've >already gone over > this once. > Could you point me to those ? Somehow I haven't been successful in >locating them. this link might be useful http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-mm/2000-07/msg00038.html Anil Kumar Prasad, Hardware Design, IBM Global Services, Pune, INDIA Phone:6349724 , 4007117 extn:1310 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/