Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030596AbVKDEFO (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:05:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030597AbVKDEFO (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:05:14 -0500 Received: from fmr22.intel.com ([143.183.121.14]:41429 "EHLO scsfmr002.sc.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030596AbVKDEFM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:05:12 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: RE: processor module locks up hyperthreading enabled machine Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 20:05:08 -0800 Message-ID: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB6006380C8D@scsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: processor module locks up hyperthreading enabled machine Thread-Index: AcXf48yPd5/h5R8qSFKjf6r8IOI/yQBEJGZw From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" To: "Reinhard Nissl" Cc: , "Brown, Len" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Nov 2005 04:05:09.0568 (UTC) FILETIME=[F289B400:01C5E0F4] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1624 Lines: 46 >-----Original Message----- >From: Reinhard Nissl [mailto:rnissl@gmx.de] >Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 11:30 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Brown, Len >Subject: Re: processor module locks up hyperthreading enabled machine > >Hi, > >Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > >> Hmmmmm.... Please try the latest patch here >> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5452 > >Your patch fixed the freeze. Tested with kernel 2.6.14. > >I should have mentioned, that my system is equiped with a >Fujitsu-Siemens Mainboard D1562-A2, most recent BIOS V4.06 R1.09. > >I'll try to get this bug fixed in the BIOS, but chances are not that >good as the board is already "quite old". > >Would you please be so kind and drop a few lines about the >drawbacks of >this BIOS bug? What kind of functionality is lost by "ignoring" the >second CPU at this particular code section? > It will basically disable ACPI Processor Power Management features. P-state (speedstep or dynamic change of frequency to save power) and C-states beyond C1 and T-states. >From dmesg, I know that on your system C2 and beyond is not supported. T-states are kind of unimportantish. Only other difference will be P-state. Not sure whether your processor supports speedstep and dynamic change of cpufreq. If it doesn't, then you won't loose anything by this workaround. Thanks, Venki - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/