Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161065AbVKDFNI (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2005 00:13:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161066AbVKDFNI (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2005 00:13:08 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:7854 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161065AbVKDFNH (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2005 00:13:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 21:12:54 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Mike Krufky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org, kirk.lapray@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/37] dvb: add nxt200x frontend module Message-Id: <20051103211254.607a5d32.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <436A959D.8090403@linuxtv.org> References: <43672436.6000006@m1k.net> <20051103141125.1463c1bd.akpm@osdl.org> <436A959D.8090403@linuxtv.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1837 Lines: 52 Mike Krufky wrote: > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > >Michael Krufky wrote: > > > >>+ > >>+static int nxt200x_writetuner (struct nxt200x_state* state, u8* data) > >>+{ > >>+ u8 buf, count = 0; > >>+ > >>+ dprintk("%s\n", __FUNCTION__); > >>+ > >>+ dprintk("Tuner Bytes: %02X %02X %02X %02X\n", data[0], data[1], data[2], data[3]); > >>+ > >>+ /* if pll is a Philips TUV1236D then write directly to tuner */ > >>+ if (strcmp(state->config->pll_desc->name, "Philips TUV1236D") == 0) { > >> > >> > >Does DVB have a better way of identifying a device type than strcmp? > > > > > I said the same thing when I first saw this, but I wanted to send the > patches separately, because Kirk wrote the driver, and I corrected the > above issue in a separate patch: > > dvb-determine-tuner-write-method-based-on-nxt-chip.patch > > Feel free to fold them if you like... I was only trying to indicate separate authorship. OK. > As for the other comments for the rest of the patch series, some of the fixes are trivial. Should I expect that you will correct these? or do you need me to send you more patches? I got lazy and didn't alter the patches in any way. Mostly this was a "please do it this way in the future" exercise. > For now, I think the corrections should wait for Johannes' return, > unless you want to take care of them. I think he comes back JUST after > the end of the merge window... not quite sure. At your convenience. > I have 3 or 4 more patches coming.... I plan to send before the end of > tonight. Oh good. More patches ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/