Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 22:32:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 22:31:58 -0400 Received: from femail40.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.254.60.34]:37602 "EHLO femail40.sdc1.sfba.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 22:31:43 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Rob Landley Reply-To: landley@trommello.org Organization: Boundaries Unlimited To: Benjamin LaHaise Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 18:31:30 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] In-Reply-To: <20011003150355.A3780@redhat.com> <20011003213010.F3780@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20011003213010.F3780@redhat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01100318313002.00728@localhost.localdomain> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 03 October 2001 21:30, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:10:10PM -0400, jamal wrote: > > > Well, this sounds like a 2.5 patch. When do we get to merge it? > > > > It is backward compatible to 2.4 netif_rx() which means it can go in now. > > The problem is netdrivers that want to use the interface have to be > > morphed. > > I'm alluding to the fact that we need a place to put in-development > patches. Such as a 2.5 kernel tree? :) Sorry, couldn't resist. It was just hanging there... *Sniff* I tried. I was weak...! Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/