Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932067AbVKFWvq (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:51:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932263AbVKFWvq (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:51:46 -0500 Received: from systemlinux.org ([83.151.29.59]:23533 "EHLO m18s25.vlinux.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932067AbVKFWvp (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:51:45 -0500 Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:51:38 +0100 From: Andre Noll To: Neil Brown Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (linux-2.6.14) Message-ID: <20051106225138.GF26862@skl-net.de> References: <20051106193142.GD26862@skl-net.de> <17262.31781.497775.640424@cse.unsw.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17262.31781.497775.640424@cse.unsw.edu.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1038 Lines: 26 On 08:56, Neil Brown wrote: > This seems to suggest that the nfsd thread is always runnable, which > implies a read-only load with everything in cache - at least for the > 10 seconds leading up to each of these errors. Is that likely? Hm, not sure. I was compiling glibc and simultanously running a big "cvs update" on the nfs server when one of these BUGs happened. glibc source and the cvs tree live somewhere in /home and /home is exported rw to a bunch of clients. But no client should have accessed those two subdirs at that time. > The following patch might fix it. Please let me know the result. Patch applied and rebooted. The box currently compiles glibc and firefox in parallel. No problems so far. Thanks a lot Andre -- Jesus not only saves, he also frequently makes backups - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/