Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 03:32:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 03:32:43 -0400 Received: from foobar.isg.de ([62.96.243.63]:36272 "HELO mail.isg.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 03:32:23 -0400 Message-ID: <3BBC10A2.D8283D88@isg.de> Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 09:32:50 +0200 From: Constantin Loizides Organization: Innovative Software AG X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9-ac18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "sebastien.cabaniols" Cc: kernel-list Subject: Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem uses Linus Torvalds ? In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hallo Sebastien, > In terms of intergration into the kernel, functionnalities, > stability and performance which one is the best for entreprise class > servers You might want to take a look at http://www.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de/~loizides/reiserfs/ where I try to answer the one of your criteria, namely performance, and how performance behaves over time, eg. when the file system is heavily used... The focus is on ReiserFS compared to Ext2, though I plan to set up some tests with XFS and JFS soon (to get the results before end of october) Constantin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/