Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964853AbVKGPr2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:47:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964830AbVKGPr2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:47:28 -0500 Received: from 193.37.26.69.virtela.com ([69.26.37.193]:49792 "EHLO teapot.corp.reactrix.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964850AbVKGPr1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:47:27 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:47:18 -0800 From: Nick Hengeveld To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GIT 0.99.9e Message-ID: <20051107154718.GJ3001@reactrix.com> References: <7v64r5t3m0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v64r5t3m0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 848 Lines: 20 On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:43:19PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > - http-push seems to still have a bug or two but that is to be > expected for any new code, and I am reasonably sure it can be > ironed out; preferably before 1.0 but it is not a > showstopper. It seems like a minor point, but is this the appropriate name or should it be dav-push? Not that there's anything else in the works AFAIK but it's certainly possible that something else could run over HTTP later on. -- For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/