Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:02:53 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.14-mm1
Message-ID: <20051107170253.GA17785@infradead.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20051106182447.5f571a46.akpm@osdl.org> <20051107033009.GB12192@infradead.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0511071315530.1387@scrub.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0511071315530.1387@scrub.home>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 991
Lines: 22

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 01:18:26PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > gosh.  Can we please get one of the patches to allow m68k in mainline
> > merged?  roman has been blocking these since 2.6.13 at least.  Alternatively
> > just kill m68k from mainline due to lack of active maintainer.
> 
> It's not a problem on my part, Al is constantly vetoing these patches.
> I'm not taking this blame. :-(

You've threatened all kinds of nasty things in case Al's perfectly reasonable
patchkit goes in.  That's certainly what I would call blocking.  Your patch
split has clear disadvantages over the original ones, but I don't really
care which one we get as long as we get this bullshit sorted out.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/