Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:23:24 +0100 (CET)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.14-mm1
In-Reply-To: <20051107170253.GA17785@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0511071812220.1387@scrub.home>
References: <20051106182447.5f571a46.akpm@osdl.org> <20051107033009.GB12192@infradead.org>
 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0511071315530.1387@scrub.home> <20051107170253.GA17785@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1283
Lines: 35

Hi,

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> > It's not a problem on my part, Al is constantly vetoing these patches.
> > I'm not taking this blame. :-(
> 
> You've threatened all kinds of nasty things in case Al's perfectly reasonable
> patchkit goes in.

I objected to it because it were two days before the release, giving me 
zero chance to deal with it reasonably.

>  That's certainly what I would call blocking.

You were commenting on the patches in -mm and I certainly never blocked 
these. I'm actually trying to push these patches since two weeks with zero 
effect.

>  Your patch
> split has clear disadvantages over the original ones, but I don't really
> care which one we get as long as we get this bullshit sorted out.

Christoph, please stop your bullshit. :-(
The first 5 patches are pretty much Al's version, the rest is the 
remaining cleanup by me. I get _no_ help at all with these patches, with 
the effect that my m68k work has gotten to a complete halt and m68k will 
fall behind even further.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/