Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190424165051.13614-1-tmurphy@arista.com> <20190426140429.GG24576@8bytes.org>
 <CAPL0++6_Hyozhf+eA2LM=t_Vuq8HaDzcczAUm0S4=DAw4jmMpA@mail.gmail.com> <20190429115916.GA5349@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190429115916.GA5349@infradead.org>
From:   Tom Murphy <tmurphy@arista.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Apr 2019 13:17:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPL0++7G4zNp76z_8bzV84ky2vXeoX2jTCLSCC-CCWZMgwP5Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] iommu/amd: flush not present cache in iommu_map_page
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Tom Murphy <murphyt7@tcd.ie>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
        James Sewart <jamessewart@arista.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 12:59 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 03:20:35PM +0100, Tom Murphy wrote:
> > I am working on another patch to improve the intel iotlb flushing in
> > the iommu ops patch which should cover this too.
>
> So are you looking into converting the intel-iommu driver to use
> dma-iommu as well?  That would be great!

Yes. My patches depend on the "iommu/vt-d: Delegate DMA domain to
generic iommu" patch which is currently being reviewed.