Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 29 Apr 2019 05:22:10 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Cc:     Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>,
        Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rds: ib: force endiannes annotation
Message-ID: <20190429122210.GB32474@infradead.org>
References: <1556518178-13786-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org>
 <20443fd3-bd1e-9472-8ca3-e3014e59f249@solarflare.com>
 <20190429111836.GA17830@osadl.at>
 <2ffed5fc-a372-3f90-e655-bcbc740eed33@solarflare.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <2ffed5fc-a372-3f90-e655-bcbc740eed33@solarflare.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 01:02:31PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> ... are some bitwise ops on the values (bitwise ops are legal in any
> ?endianness) and incrementation of the pointers (which cares only about
> ?the pointee size, not type).

Oh, true.  That is why the underlying annotation is called __bitwise :)
I'll take my previous comment back.