Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp3608369yba; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 05:38:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw5LdYsLZuUffIwgSnNPju2tcDP4tq6/D2NGhTK2Wi+zpp+hLkCgV6kLJl2PkWMHHd7bcTs X-Received: by 2002:a62:e90b:: with SMTP id j11mr61704164pfh.118.1556541498815; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 05:38:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556541498; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YY25HEdFthh2go3zxrAUItCZXYOSnJBk3T2H7+Z5crcMOuIqyiTKFtB1afKaI180mE nmhH6LedD9+wSRDtmVvkeo7av2txwtiFNW4Lv58O4JHH9QAFt8INk0Ml3c2/4qTcjUjy e9Dy6jiT8QjF9PeM8vQE/C0rL/1Ab245PPRxM3HA/WIoZuCwPeoMg3WC31dkV2NLocvu UTItX9cVEc3kfILjL4XOo0voWzRbeFGxlAsI46s4H/jA4q7kRgDqyEBaXwEnCs+bF34A D3OQtfMj8XmmLY+o1JlQZYI6eqBSgoYSrexwPgT0bLb3WMFTl9oB2Lxf30Rm6ZhYwxqI 4+KA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=oquFOqEdnFTO4z78BiUP/avZj4dFlYKtN/gN764EuDQ=; b=S0u5+Zi8HlwYi203fiKD2uFCEMJOHKMIb3Eh5YypcqBKU7f72Tlqf9vBXcoT7YHq27 HXwCXgG56sEJ7Yj1wAuan7v0DOrqkGk0fHv6KQYrPyL+85uKXn6I1bqDLqn2LET6MLAD 99IHineEOFNy6WECV/X1UDIcb+HbU0T+/Oy+WDl8yULqRFwX0G8tIXfNXczjdk0yUSWQ outB2hWiKDiqNYsPDSZDo+1/8WyI6VAUNXq9SBDOH0839V9HlGBlbXQsTo9mHjyY8cMa 6ATe0BtwfMyHXMpL5Hos+bG/PiE9suQCBlgkrXvs9sB5Zexk1jnku/i/3b0SxzRxzoif Mt5A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r19si20888717pga.328.2019.04.29.05.38.03; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 05:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728126AbfD2Mft (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:35:49 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:55618 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728044AbfD2Mft (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:35:49 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9212A78; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 05:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.196.75] (e110467-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.75]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 826383F740; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 05:35:47 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/26] arm64/iommu: improve mmap bounds checking To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Joerg Roedel , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Tom Lendacky , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190422175942.18788-1-hch@lst.de> <20190422175942.18788-3-hch@lst.de> From: Robin Murphy Message-ID: <306b7a19-4eb5-d1d8-5250-40f3ba9bca16@arm.com> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 13:35:46 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190422175942.18788-3-hch@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22/04/2019 18:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The nr_pages checks should be done for all mmap requests, not just those > using remap_pfn_range. I think it probably makes sense now to just squash this with #22 one way or the other, but if you really really still want to keep it as a separate patch with a misleading commit message then I'm willing to keep my complaints to myself :) Robin. > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > --- > arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 21 ++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c > index 674860e3e478..604c638b2787 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c > @@ -73,19 +73,9 @@ static int __swiotlb_get_sgtable_page(struct sg_table *sgt, > static int __swiotlb_mmap_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > unsigned long pfn, size_t size) > { > - int ret = -ENXIO; > - unsigned long nr_vma_pages = vma_pages(vma); > - unsigned long nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > - unsigned long off = vma->vm_pgoff; > - > - if (off < nr_pages && nr_vma_pages <= (nr_pages - off)) { > - ret = remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start, > - pfn + off, > - vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start, > - vma->vm_page_prot); > - } > - > - return ret; > + return remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start, pfn + vma->vm_pgoff, > + vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start, > + vma->vm_page_prot); > } > #endif /* CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA */ > > @@ -241,6 +231,8 @@ static int __iommu_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma, > void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size, > unsigned long attrs) > { > + unsigned long nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > + unsigned long off = vma->vm_pgoff; > struct vm_struct *area; > int ret; > > @@ -249,6 +241,9 @@ static int __iommu_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma, > if (dma_mmap_from_dev_coherent(dev, vma, cpu_addr, size, &ret)) > return ret; > > + if (off >= nr_pages || vma_pages(vma) > nr_pages - off) > + return -ENXIO; > + > if (!is_vmalloc_addr(cpu_addr)) { > unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(virt_to_page(cpu_addr)); > return __swiotlb_mmap_pfn(vma, pfn, size); >