Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp4774024yba; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 04:16:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxT3pZlEH83EtJHfqMXyDw+4VWh4ZYF8ClYaE3id4X6KQ6/Yob8nVGJLmskR7I1agHyPFLK X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:5609:: with SMTP id h9mr59015419pli.35.1556622982711; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 04:16:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556622982; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oPE0Nee27OH3PN4/weVvI0EcGoHexNalnu184nR8h6v9yF/vP8op6VyNB2bYjppWtu +8T6wwvNCJy/IHcMoPYBoz46KPIUol970fAHVFSMiLKH8zFS0XpiK2blvUnTaM+3lBlC hrZ3qe2c5JBy8QeSrFXKaFIi7VYUwD3bU6sFWOBphPfGHzzm2B9SSqWgafXQr3MO0rPO TD8ZmVPvH63wl67iMyZQAdas/xx6OAnBbuubeqZWyoOx+I204Jc5Ckp4crnNP43gcqop pS1/FkhKauVlwWMoEpQZu+ceIqa4uBwC22hVYsGr50U1H93W0KQZSDz5eOp8riu2Nf8Z zdhw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=+apvPOK9hOKuyGFcfXqjcVJRX/KMiOheouDto7GSYrU=; b=E/MVV2VXsdgccn51h0TYzpri5dikyJTdByVhI+rCMPku33h2rkrDn9Md0avCEQuZov uUhxAuEy9Lpt8YZrE7KyuIbZnC/AKyy76MUAD2fBafth0B/XxnIMBLQl98AtTfYJdfNh 7bBuFhUvy8d3gd5VRTOA/fuSrvmfcdepqvaJ81FlGbUSIy4QrVhxHHaxCrTk8HxX040f NRz5wDUDaE/ay0KNJ/3ycl0liWM5aFI+5dU/Ao5MK3w6w0ADaKLpb9tso2st37AoYTUG xczBVqdnlbFoWGasSM2opo6QiVFbL127Asd3Kn5y0wSLXtSbtS+pgHA2l7ix99wyybYY AXpw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=OlG3x6DS; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si38933885plu.320.2019.04.30.04.16.06; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 04:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=OlG3x6DS; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727496AbfD3LOf (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 Apr 2019 07:14:35 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f65.google.com ([209.85.217.65]:34254 "EHLO mail-vs1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727461AbfD3LOf (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Apr 2019 07:14:35 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-f65.google.com with SMTP id b23so89449vso.1 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 04:14:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+apvPOK9hOKuyGFcfXqjcVJRX/KMiOheouDto7GSYrU=; b=OlG3x6DSEKoTSrHDdX3ybp6fgR+JxEYnOW6sgWdoouyfjOMZfIZE834Z0i1m4d147e yh01OWpa7Edvr5/DLSw4qqB8LMCNiX6xfb3u9ldeB5liaei3o+eamVJpoz15S4Di9YII N6OoTOfeYCULR2C/P3lYgfImFJYDCIrkgWUkZczpN1A48fy5NIuyoJS3kmm+qXRQDaW7 fQTR+sko1QYp8Y9xuuWEQmS/WEufRgOb11yfjRtsiozp+zLSS624cIH40INcfhqvWQzF 5/ZF1BLNue1OMHom1HohEH3No7Eg1JyIyx+xodFErGChH//VZmOfMLRkNZCuTkzjv/Ks d+VA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+apvPOK9hOKuyGFcfXqjcVJRX/KMiOheouDto7GSYrU=; b=I6v6F4reGxSTKsYzuWqYjxnqyH34SlcCFCkxIfxMJ8bIu2kDDsUv47crJKYsxfVTKE ZFQqtqbkv0N+gOsvwBtRisetAFHXl3x1v3fnbMeroYS85gqrFOjNJbbYHpRWt8k2JIhy 9pFZERI/SrOutK2bjjEzgQQ0QGRxCQS76DUE7paZzSNPpTP5npUBa+gV5Wg9x0qh380H QU8KIlh5vYO1UmlWA0Dr1uXH15NuLMKtzsID0JocH1yPjVocHV1/Z+/bd1ZSREHBtysn f0wBfhQmcmaaackDaMfuBvwkeISGK76W63uQwaI4XNU5+eLzDn77X15yq134ccfAHurN GUZA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU4C3JE+dFeIGR/m+GbJOwHIfXxbjIB4u6O/USheoWi+3D1rHLE bJ5o0kpIy3XBZr6+Qox7kcbKqw+OuBU5vSmu6D2Ymg== X-Received: by 2002:a67:c987:: with SMTP id y7mr310439vsk.35.1556622874058; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 04:14:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1556264798-18540-1-git-send-email-ludovic.Barre@st.com> In-Reply-To: <1556264798-18540-1-git-send-email-ludovic.Barre@st.com> From: Ulf Hansson Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:13:57 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/5] mmc: mmci: add busy detect for stm32 sdmmc variant To: Ludovic Barre Cc: Rob Herring , Srinivas Kandagatla , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , DTML , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 09:46, Ludovic Barre wrote: > > From: Ludovic Barre > > This patch series adds busy detect for stm32 sdmmc variant. > Some adaptations are required: > -Avoid to check and poll busy status when is not expected. > -Clear busy status bit if busy_detect_flag and busy_detect_mask are > different. > -Add hardware busy timeout with MMCIDATATIMER register. > > V2: > -mmci_cmd_irq cleanup in separate patch. > -simplify the busy_detect_flag exclude > -replace sdmmc specific comment in > "mmc: mmci: avoid fake busy polling in mmci_irq" > to focus on common behavior > > Ludovic Barre (5): > mmc: mmci: cleanup mmci_cmd_irq for busy detect feature > mmc: mmci: avoid fake busy polling in mmci_irq > mmc: mmci: fix clear of busy detect status > mmc: mmci: add hardware busy timeout feature > mmc: mmci: add busy detect for stm32 sdmmc variant > > drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.7.4 > Ludovic, just wanted to let you know that I am reviewing and testing this series. However, while running some tests on Ux500 for validating the busy detection code, even without your series applied, I encounter some odd behaviors. I am looking into the problem to understand better and will let you know as soon as I have some more data to share. Kind regards Uffe