Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp4795203yba; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 04:37:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwTU2yHiOUjzUBsPPhf7pJwNCL7v2fUOcAqx8a1lq9mW0U99N5wvVTd4dHeWHETxaVh/hBg X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8bca:: with SMTP id r10mr23107019plo.67.1556624264511; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 04:37:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556624264; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zYtReAa4FPtd7RDEgSj2SnIsY2W7KEIdr1ZadZA4VwhxqchofrE3SSAGwMH5E3nNKF W5lS0rW6kx/EhccrYqxIUbQ8LgRaq1KE6kzzxvg/ms2WGvnT4NWeUkwOZZl8j8GEDJGI T5tKSjG1n/6RwvpC5mah0539lvxqOc01+Y2KZRz+uVwDkEI9ccg7YuXCADeWqCq/JqvB HJ2RRHbrj+6uOxMBcAMGbkxIr0eJbxl7oys4a2TwbREMI6N9DlzUeENp5qRvV1PPsIWT 0zS4RX9mq2Iq+31SggzZ9PkN0XgXS8Du7xGAbX89c7D5kqKG/xcYhu2QyS9DtZd/HhuG JCnA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=pdZfMZSWBQHWlu8gT6FaTYeDi2ohAKJexWBnJUn5QeQ=; b=cLzavBc+jeTLTP6HwixULyfEmvREv1v/wPqnS/H2fiKl2qfopL1WMKxjukYViKDkLl 7MWjEDpGHPe8Iuq6Qae4gyL/1OajRoHhHTSA4vgemPC2BT2BQATud5YKYIk/tGsUvG/t fpBQiZWXW662Y2rxYSvQpZr3u3SD2fgXdTzstmOxda/YpiXr3QDJetSUcwP1R8ARnTze URqxaQybSHol8QrlomysMUB5pxEz4mGrAYICNzQgtWcS+dSKnk4zV5n7puQEiSovGR84 ADRfmaTzevOlJxH40Fvis7be5M/FAvLesSvu79zOSo7Oa5BzKK1JdbToYMuxsMwrz8nh qMww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c68si23546510pfa.56.2019.04.30.04.37.28; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 04:37:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727376AbfD3Lep (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 Apr 2019 07:34:45 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:6143 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726129AbfD3Leo (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Apr 2019 07:34:44 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Apr 2019 04:34:43 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,413,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="295763947" Received: from mylly.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.72.154]) ([10.237.72.154]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Apr 2019 04:34:42 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mfd: intel-lpss: Add Intel Comet Lake PCI IDs To: Andy Shevchenko , Evan Green Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Lee Jones , LKML References: <20190409151100.16027-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> From: Jarkko Nikula Message-ID: <12f48b95-7a45-919e-0eb5-30e00e692743@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:34:26 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/16/19 10:55 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:10 AM Evan Green wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:11 PM Andy Shevchenko >> wrote: >>> >>> Intel Comet Lake has the same LPSS than Intel Cannon Lake. >>> Add the new IDs to the list of supported devices. > >>> static const struct pci_device_id intel_lpss_pci_ids[] = { >>> + /* CML */ >>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02a8), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_uart_info }, >>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02a9), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_uart_info }, >>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02aa), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_info }, >>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02ab), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_info }, >>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02c5), (kernel_ulong_t)&bxt_i2c_info }, >>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02c6), (kernel_ulong_t)&bxt_i2c_info }, >> >> How come it's not cnl_i2c_info? > > This is a good question, that's why Jarkko asked Lee to hold on until > we have confirmation about i2c timings. > I got confirmation I2C uses the same input clock than Cannon Lake and matches with my measurements. Andy: please do s/bxt_i2c_info/cnl_i2c_info/ in your patch. -- Jarkko