Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 09:02:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 09:02:39 -0400 Received: from robur.slu.se ([130.238.98.12]:7944 "EHLO robur.slu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 09:02:22 -0400 From: Robert Olsson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15292.24193.308549.459631@robur.slu.se> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 15:05:05 +0200 To: Cc: jamal , Alexey Kuznetsov , , Robert Olsson , , , Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 6.92 under Emacs 19.34.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar writes: > > i'm asking the following thing. dev->quota, as i read the patch now, can > cause extra calls to ->poll() even though the RX ring of that particular > device is empty and the driver has indicated it's done processing RX > packets. (i'm now assuming that the extra-polling-for-a-jiffy line in the > current patch is removed - that one is a showstopper to begin with.) Is > this claim of mine correct? Hello! Well I'm the one to blame... :-) This comes from my experiments to delay to polling before going into RX-irq-enable mode. This is one of the areas to be addressed further with NAPI. And this code was not in any of the files that I announced I think..? Cheers. --ro - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/