Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 1 May 2019 07:38:27 +1000
From:   "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
To:     Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc:     "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@kernel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] livepatch: Use correct kobject cleanup function
Message-ID: <20190430213827.GD9454@eros.localdomain>
References: <20190430001534.26246-1-tobin@kernel.org>
 <20190430001534.26246-3-tobin@kernel.org>
 <alpine.LSU.2.21.1904301256550.8507@pobox.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.21.1904301256550.8507@pobox.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:00:05PM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> 
> > The correct cleanup function after a call to kobject_init_and_add() has
> > succeeded is kobject_del() _not_ kobject_put().  kobject_del() calls
> > kobject_put().
> > 
> > Use correct cleanup function when removing a kobject.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <tobin@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/livepatch/core.c | 8 +++-----
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> > index 98a7bec41faa..4cce6bb6e073 100644
> > --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> > @@ -589,9 +589,8 @@ static void __klp_free_funcs(struct klp_object *obj, bool nops_only)
> >  
> >  		list_del(&func->node);
> >  
> > -		/* Might be called from klp_init_patch() error path. */
> 
> Could you leave the comment as is? If I am not mistaken, it is still 
> valid. func->kobj_added check is here exactly because the function may be 
> called as mentioned.

Will put it back in for you on v2

thanks,
Tobin.