Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp5970658yba; Wed, 1 May 2019 03:38:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwE3UVtDnSjpu2eu8+sPYKs+sih7sKjA0zaUYqgkjjE09vvYHAsZeRXL8SEUT0RRYPpJk51 X-Received: by 2002:a62:489d:: with SMTP id q29mr19438459pfi.45.1556707099578; Wed, 01 May 2019 03:38:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556707099; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ete0mgnkNpR50iEt7VNTthS4oUI5tBAq+6cFwiSL53CEyg2NfiIhLpCUFKCWJXjcN2 uezeOTHjT3nIHWAA5MJ5LwdUr9R1i/kbxjLA92MT4gufODsHI7C3K1eb/GAVLy+OuqSR cnZMsnElkVnN+ucNPI2YLbZ6spWtYsrBsgHccMc/Rq/l18bs6S4xhWTCeVZGNkdMHlXI h1Y4slPldo7T/DZNqF6NL1ZWAZXAQQeyM5kazBplqSncYtji1hvfxlXdwWn0bGuPSQg6 yqw4VPvn65r2jGrcyz3RmlrGRIK5qDMYAmk7RrgFcaEKnp250fDstC2qx+eCMZhvuzcm axHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-filter :dkim-signature; bh=xUNgtvQRFKyYsdfzqHIQRM1/8TevvQ9MUZytgCe0Bcg=; b=C0iK3H8HIAa6Ibvz7yElJOBL7O+lfN/lYG7QcoIQHOo5XCJd8mNwqj08+zH4Su/P/N dee9MptHQlLo/Io5nFjjA6EtDl/f2Ak1vZjHVqSGlOi+r2jx2BoCIJDdkP5GdBaSU3as UzVN+DhEUOnmtHw3TED3SGohFOCNCrEYnkBZxEfFvo5nXD72WABF5bmOUr9dmwKJuuoy wvmhlutCFaB7Pgz0d4B7nsDw4Y7PEfSCfQubj2wZaAnHCNEVi11qbiSfi2cGHQW6NFJN +EFB+VE85efSecEOfdBqWcV0DRUMk/u64jUEzfzvTubniKo0UlelgxbOHgGr0p4w9Ifb XM8A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@fjfi.cvut.cz header.s=20151024 header.b=AS7jt7FK; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 35si33753761ple.382.2019.05.01.03.38.04; Wed, 01 May 2019 03:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@fjfi.cvut.cz header.s=20151024 header.b=AS7jt7FK; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726166AbfEAKhJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 1 May 2019 06:37:09 -0400 Received: from mailgw2.fjfi.cvut.cz ([147.32.9.131]:37416 "EHLO mailgw2.fjfi.cvut.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725782AbfEAKhI (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 May 2019 06:37:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw2.fjfi.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02625A0261; Wed, 1 May 2019 12:37:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fjfi.cvut.cz; s=20151024; t=1556707026; i=@fjfi.cvut.cz; bh=xUNgtvQRFKyYsdfzqHIQRM1/8TevvQ9MUZytgCe0Bcg=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=AS7jt7FKvTgOTl13fyJcvaOTmNJ2dZf4ZuuB17hfuzLpXKbkjnJ9YmDqdAUvphajn YYnHoGYNT8phdmDr3oRDhSeVcuZC+Bf6ZNFTZbQaMA+eUDtosG332AHP0oBgX10g6m mKIOk1DPak4GBM7EkEAAILym7uJqpLbBOAHli7fo= X-CTU-FNSPE-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fjfi.cvut.cz Received: from mailgw2.fjfi.cvut.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailgw2.fjfi.cvut.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10022) with ESMTP id sWmveC4fgvN5; Wed, 1 May 2019 12:36:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from linux.fjfi.cvut.cz (linux.fjfi.cvut.cz [147.32.5.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgw2.fjfi.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D1DAA00DC; Wed, 1 May 2019 12:36:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailgw2.fjfi.cvut.cz 5D1DAA00DC Received: by linux.fjfi.cvut.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 147DB6004D; Wed, 1 May 2019 12:36:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by linux.fjfi.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CC06002A; Wed, 1 May 2019 12:36:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 12:36:40 +0200 (CEST) From: David Kozub To: Jens Axboe , Jonathan Derrick , Scott Bauer , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cc: Jonas Rabenstein Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: sed-opal: add ioctl for done-mark of shadow mbr In-Reply-To: <1556666459-17948-2-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> Message-ID: References: <1556666459-17948-1-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> <1556666459-17948-2-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 1 May 2019, David Kozub wrote: > @@ -104,6 +109,12 @@ struct opal_mbr_data { > __u8 __align[7]; > }; > > +struct opal_mbr_done { > + struct opal_key key; > + __u8 done_flag; > + __u8 __align[7]; > +}; While I just copied opal_mbr_data here, I wonder what is the point of __align in these structs. By itself it just pads the structure to have a size that is a multiple of 8. Is this to make sure that anything that lies past the structure is 8-bytes aligned (assuming the start is 8-bytes aligned too), perhaps for 32bit userspace with 64bit kernel? And if it's this, is it needed for these IOCTL structs? (I can see it being useful for struct opal_key.) Best regards, David