Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Cc:     linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 05/16] PM / devfreq: tegra: Don't set EMC clock rate to maximum on probe
Date:   Thu,  2 May 2019 02:38:04 +0300
Message-Id: <20190501233815.32643-6-digetx@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190501233815.32643-1-digetx@gmail.com>
References: <20190501233815.32643-1-digetx@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

There is no real benefit from doing so, hence let's drop that rate setting
for consistency.

Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
index c7428c5eee23..24ec65556c39 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
@@ -653,8 +653,6 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return PTR_ERR(tegra->emc_clock);
 	}
 
-	clk_set_rate(tegra->emc_clock, ULONG_MAX);
-
 	tegra->rate_change_nb.notifier_call = tegra_actmon_rate_notify_cb;
 	err = clk_notifier_register(tegra->emc_clock, &tegra->rate_change_nb);
 	if (err) {
-- 
2.21.0