Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030273AbVKHRNd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:13:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030275AbVKHRNd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:13:33 -0500 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:53457 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1030273AbVKHRNc (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:13:32 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:13:28 -0800 (PST) From: "Randy.Dunlap" X-X-Sender: rddunlap@shark.he.net To: Jan Beulich cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: make trap information available to die handlers In-Reply-To: <4370E9A2.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> Message-ID: References: <4370AEE1.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> <4370E5C4.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> <4370E9A2.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 833 Lines: 23 On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Jan Beulich wrote: > >And the patch (attachment) also contains From:, but it's missing > >a Signed-off-by: line. > > I looked at many ChangeLog entries (which supposedly get created from > the abstract), and by far not all of them have the author listed both as > From: and Singed-Off-By:, which made me think that either of the two > should be sufficient (and I really can't see why the author information > needs to appear twice). Tools can determined the From: part from your email, so it's often safe to omit that part. The S-o-b part is required... -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/