Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 2 May 2019 16:17:58 +0200
From:   Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.1-rc5
In-Reply-To: <20190502122128.GA2670@kroah.com>
References: <CAHk-=wjvcuyCQGnfOhooaL1H4H63qXO=xgo+9yncSOG=eK+kbA@mail.gmail.com>
        <20190415051919.GA31481@infradead.org>
        <CAHk-=wj7jgMOVFW0tiU-X+zhg6+Rn7mEBTej+f26rV3zXezOSA@mail.gmail.com>
        <20190502122128.GA2670@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20190502161758.26972bb2@mschwideX1>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 2 May 2019 14:21:28 +0200
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 09:17:10AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:19 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:  
> > >
> > > Can we please have the page refcount overflow fixes out on the list
> > > for review, even if it is after the fact?  
> > 
> > They were actually on a list for review long before the fact, but it
> > was the security mailing list. The issue actually got discussed back
> > in January along with early versions of the patches, but then we
> > dropped the ball because it just wasn't on anybody's radar and it got
> > resurrected late March. Willy wrote a rather bigger patch-series, and
> > review of that is what then resulted in those commits. So they may
> > look recent, but that's just because the original patches got
> > seriously edited down and rewritten.
> > 
> > That said, powerpc and s390 should at least look at maybe adding a
> > check for the page ref in their gup paths too. Powerpc has the special
> > gup_hugepte() case, and s390 has its own version of gup entirely. I
> > was actually hoping the s390 guys would look at using the generic gup
> > code.
> > 
> > I ruthlessly also entirely ignored MIPS, SH and sparc, since they seem
> > largely irrelevant, partly since even theoretically this whole issue
> > needs a _lot_ of memory.
> > 
> > Michael, Martin, see commit 6b3a70773630 ("Merge branch 'page-refs'
> > (page ref overflow)"). You may or may not really care.  
> 
> I've now queued these patches up for the next round of stable releases,
> as some people seem to care about these.
> 
> I didn't see any follow-on patches for s390 or ppc64 hit the tree for
> these changes, am I just missing them and should also queue up a few
> more to handle this issue on those platforms?

I fixed that with a different approach. The following two patches are
queued for the next merge window:

d1874a0c2805 "s390/mm: make the pxd_offset functions more robust"
1a42010cdc26 "s390/mm: convert to the generic get_user_pages_fast code"

With these two s390 now uses the generic gup code in mm/gup.c

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.