Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp7442685yba; Thu, 2 May 2019 09:55:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzBNMt6N8FuQMxppRDZpCUZDHJZ3cSj4vyDJi9MODvGVdTcqh3NCJygAkYH2kPr9ECvZ4qN X-Received: by 2002:a63:5907:: with SMTP id n7mr5085459pgb.416.1556816103801; Thu, 02 May 2019 09:55:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556816103; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FxPE6xsp3tXu4oxx+gbL4GNhqQ4LFIka+tBGCtDNkvNhRP/QIl7lEBXSNzw67f44JL raaPUplmCErhpQUEkdszaErNdttuMVNULAar3QXUqok8aUNs+rt/TQC5qhXXGCwppahg 7YgSvWsRCl1lQzkO8/WF+X7w621aoeNutbuf/ydvCnX3f0Mqzu9gCcXWHie95OqNqhck vYGJiNEoKn5NC9TJnQmQCOCX3PfBRl2FWSXkIt5PAlAtSeiaBnCR6mBkZAunlMN2z6gh iiDm4YgDWKYGJF8Tn2Y8V44ZRcsnGPA2fY6HOxm+xbiNIRHsUHs72z4yn8Zu+ASBAcb6 44IQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=LxmvJEQEbA/Z6LpRx3JJyAiyU/fQhg9waKR18DioOqA=; b=VYYiktZNzTN7IkBnQjcMfZm5qvquDSXlsHUBDa8i8/k67VnKr7IoURdq/RY/NZRq0H 1WsyPxz9THA48fppmX2tB+BaMlJvzoFW0MLgtwRRtw+MrECuV2h5oRmRfAfKPf5gCLLW +pzMg2tzHMtwcUClSH/QuRkxmQro95v9Qh2/mdQmsh203qcKSPkSt1BG7UdakyAF5pAX MZxiaWIbN/V8bI5cGIjStktJrsMK3iK9D3lCqmsYpHN2y1rMEkEy7yDlpxsgqknR75Ob HYuyra7g6PMF7ID197OepuaiF6AlMh7Y8j9sFY+RzHuBK5Sd+lfcDo2wYkRKxGoyf1cb f8/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j6si36775991pgq.127.2019.05.02.09.54.48; Thu, 02 May 2019 09:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726607AbfEBQwd (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 2 May 2019 12:52:33 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:54856 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726121AbfEBQwd (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 May 2019 12:52:33 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x42GgKaf046499 for ; Thu, 2 May 2019 12:52:31 -0400 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2s83w19fwx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 02 May 2019 12:52:31 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 2 May 2019 17:52:30 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 2 May 2019 17:52:26 +0100 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x42GqQXT38142030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 2 May 2019 16:52:26 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44DC5205A; Thu, 2 May 2019 16:52:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.95.175]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E365204E; Thu, 2 May 2019 16:52:24 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] add the buffer to the xattr From: Mimi Zohar To: Prakhar Srivastava , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-secuirty-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, nayna@linux.ibm.com Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 12:52:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190429214743.4625-3-prsriva02@gmail.com> References: <20190429214743.4625-1-prsriva02@gmail.com> <20190429214743.4625-3-prsriva02@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19050216-0028-0000-0000-00000369A3AC X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19050216-0029-0000-0000-000024290FDF Message-Id: <1556815933.4134.77.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-05-02_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905020109 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 14:47 -0700, Prakhar Srivastava wrote: > From: Prakhar Srivastava > > add the buffer to the xattr for a buffer case Please write full patch descriptions, here and in the other patches, explaining the current status with the motivation for the change. > > Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava > --- < snip > > > @@ -630,17 +651,23 @@ static int process_buffer_measurement(const void *buff, int size, > if (ret < 0) > goto err_out; > > - ret = ima_store_template(entry, violation, NULL, > + if (action & IMA_MEASURE) > + ret = ima_store_template(entry, violation, NULL, > buff, pcr); Although scripts/Lindent has its problems, it does a good job with code formatting.  There's no reason here for the line breakage. Mimi