Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 3 May 2019 17:19:15 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     stern@rowland.harvard.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: f68f031d ("Documentation: atomic_t.txt: Explain ordering
 provided by smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic()")
Message-ID: <20190503151915.GD2606@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20190503145326.GA21541@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190503145326.GA21541@linux.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 07:53:26AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello, Alan,
> 
> Just following up on the -rcu commit below.  I believe that it needs
> some adjustment given Peter Zijlstra's addition of "memory" to the x86
> non-value-returning atomics, but thought I should double-check.

Right; I should get back to that thread...