Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 3 May 2019 20:21:10 +0300
From:   Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
To:     Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Cc:     Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        "linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] mips: Reserve memory for the kernel image resources
Message-ID: <20190503172108.u7q7dpdo2ggbluar@mobilestation>
References: <20190423224748.3765-1-fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
 <20190423224748.3765-5-fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
 <20190424224343.4skr727fszycwksq@pburton-laptop>
 <20190426000035.yfonfvrapmm4j3fg@mobilestation>
 <20190430225832.cjk7mj6dotw3cib6@pburton-laptop>
 <20190502142434.mpoyu4hhbunur5xe@mobilestation>
 <20190502184537.ccxnrh6x7vg55kly@pburton-laptop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190502184537.ccxnrh6x7vg55kly@pburton-laptop>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello Paul

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 06:45:39PM +0000, Paul Burton wrote:
> Hi Serge,
> 
> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 05:24:37PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > Just reviewed and tested your series on my machine. I tagged the whole series
> > in a response to the cover-letter of [1].
> 
> Thanks for the review & testing; that series is now in mips-next.
> 
> > Could you please proceed with this patchset review procedure? There are
> > also eight more patches left without your tag or comment.  This patch
> > is also left with no explicit tag.
> > 
> > BTW I see you already applied patches 1-3 to the mips-next, so what shall I
> > do when sending a v2 patchset with fixes asked to be provided for patch 12
> > and possibly for others in future? Shall I just resend the series without that
> > applied patches or send them over with your acked-by tagges?
> 
> I've so far applied patches 1-7 of your series to mips-next, and stopped
> at patch 8 which has a comment to address.
> 
> My preference would be if you could send a v2 which just contains the
> remaining patches (ie. patches 8-12 become patches 1-5), ideally atop
> the mips-next branch.
> 
> The series looks good to me once the review comments are addressed, but
> no need to add an Acked-by - it'll be implicit when I apply them to
> mips-next.
> 

Agreed. I'll do it shortly.

-Sergey

> Thanks,
>     Paul