Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190503033440.cow6xm4p4hezgkxv@linux-r8p5> <20190503034205.12121-1-deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
 <20190503063435.446aqcckbc6ri7xx@dcvr>
In-Reply-To: <20190503063435.446aqcckbc6ri7xx@dcvr>
From:   Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 May 2019 11:21:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CABeXuvqRSO_0pkU2i0eNK2JtRZcPquF0X0h_GJANiQvEuisQHw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask()
To:     Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Omar Kilani <omar.kilani@gmail.com>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 11:34 PM Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> wrote:
>
> Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sorry, I was trying a new setup at work. I should have tested it.
> > My bad, I've checked this one.
>
> Thanks.  This is good w.r.t. epoll_pwait and ppoll when applied
> to 5.0.11 (no fs/io_uring.c).

Thanks. Al, would you be picking up this patch? I can resend it.

> Can't think of anything which uses pselect or aio on my system;
> but it looks right to me.
>
> > I've removed the questionable reported-by, since we're not sure if
> > it is actually the same issue.
>
> Yes, I hope Omar can test this, too.

Omar, would you be able to test this?

Thanks,
Deepa