Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030335AbVKIBrI (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:47:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965156AbVKIBrI (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:47:08 -0500 Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com ([195.54.107.73]:57785 "EHLO mxfep02.bredband.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964987AbVKIBrH (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:47:07 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,306,1125871200"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="8692195:sNHT30052674" Subject: Re: New Linux Development Model From: Ian Kumlien Reply-To: pomac@vapor.com To: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: fawadlateef@gmail.com, s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk, hostmaster@ed-soft.at, jerome.lacoste@gmail.com, carlsj@yahoo.com Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6cDcL6wgwCPqCeB8ehsQ" Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 02:47:48 +0100 Message-Id: <1131500868.2413.63.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2200 Lines: 60 --=-6cDcL6wgwCPqCeB8ehsQ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, posting from the outside so, no nice quotes and stuff. Anyways, I was also miffed that the kernel folks merged a 'ancient' version of ipw2200 and ieee802.11, if they had merged something more current everything would have worked out of the box and all the cleanups would have been easier to cope with. Ie, the intel ppl could release straight patches to the in kernel version. I dunno if they have changed the way their driver works now. Atm, the 'ancient' ieee802.11 is what breaks the ipw2200 build. So, basically all testing of cutting edge kernels gets very tedious due to the ieee802.11 package removing the offending .h file and making reversing -gitX and applying -gitY a real PITA. Also, I dunno if it says what version of the firmware it should have... Anyways, current state of ipw2200 is sad, and ieee802.11 is more developed out of tree. So imho at least ieee802.11 should be merged more closely and then generalized if needed (i think i saw some patches like that) and preferably ipw2200 should be merged as well. This b0rkage has actually kept me from using wlan AND testing kernel.org kernels. PS. Above, wrt merging, i assume that the API isn't quite 'stable' and that changing any drivers using them should be simple and straightforward. stable as in, used all over and require major rewrites to change =3D) DS. PPS. Why merge a outdated version of a driver/protocol/thingy at all? DS. --=20 Ian Kumlien -- http://pomac.netswarm.net --=-6cDcL6wgwCPqCeB8ehsQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDcVVE7F3Euyc51N8RAt7zAKCMaQ+KUXG6VLXbWE/a3kKwNYLumQCfQjEs Ljqc1Svbn1ktHkSxXWjwoSk= =QNwZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6cDcL6wgwCPqCeB8ehsQ-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/