Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] nvme-pci: add device coredump support
To:     Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>,
        linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
References: <1556787561-5113-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
 <1556787561-5113-4-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
From:   Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <66a5d068-47b1-341f-988f-c890d7f01720@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 4 May 2019 19:04:46 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1556787561-5113-4-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi, Akinobu,

Regardless to reply of the cover, few nits here.

On 5/2/19 5:59 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> +
> +static const struct nvme_reg nvme_regs[] = {
> +	{ NVME_REG_CAP,		"cap",		64 },
> +	{ NVME_REG_VS,		"version",	32 },

Why don't we just go with "vs" instead of full name of it just like
the others.

> +	{ NVME_REG_INTMS,	"intms",	32 },
> +	{ NVME_REG_INTMC,	"intmc",	32 },
> +	{ NVME_REG_CC,		"cc",		32 },
> +	{ NVME_REG_CSTS,	"csts",		32 },
> +	{ NVME_REG_NSSR,	"nssr",		32 },
> +	{ NVME_REG_AQA,		"aqa",		32 },
> +	{ NVME_REG_ASQ,		"asq",		64 },
> +	{ NVME_REG_ACQ,		"acq",		64 },
> +	{ NVME_REG_CMBLOC,	"cmbloc",	32 },
> +	{ NVME_REG_CMBSZ,	"cmbsz",	32 },

If it's going to support optional registers also, then we can have
BP-related things (BPINFO, BPRSEL, BPMBL) here also.

Thanks,