Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 5 May 2019 07:17:48 -0500
From:   Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/32] 5.0.13-stable review
Message-ID: <20190505121748.p7yeymdissakg4q5@xps.therub.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
References: <20190504102452.523724210@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20190505030515.txopqluki6mc2px2@xps.therub.org>
 <4913833a-5b46-20d0-4dce-3e6d46a7a498@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4913833a-5b46-20d0-4dce-3e6d46a7a498@roeck-us.net>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 08:31:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 5/4/19 8:05 PM, Dan Rue wrote:
> > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 12:24:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.0.13 release.
> > > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Mon 06 May 2019 10:24:23 AM UTC.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > Regressions detected.
> > 
> 
> Confusing. What are the regressions ? Below it says that there are none.

My mistake for dashing it off too quickly. No regressions on arm64, arm,
x86_64, and i386.

Dan

> 
> Guenter
> 
> > Summary
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > kernel: 5.0.13-rc1
> > git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> > git branch: linux-5.0.y
> > git commit: c6bd3efdcefd68cc590853c50594a9fc971d93cd
> > git describe: v5.0.12-33-gc6bd3efdcefd
> > Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.0-oe/build/v5.0.12-33-gc6bd3efdcefd
> > 
> > No regressions (compared to build v5.0.11-102-g17f93022a8c9)
> > 
> > No fixes (compared to build v5.0.11-102-g17f93022a8c9)
> > 
> > Ran 25060 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
> > 
> > Environments
> > --------------
> > - dragonboard-410c
> > - hi6220-hikey
> > - i386
> > - juno-r2
> > - qemu_arm
> > - qemu_arm64
> > - qemu_i386
> > - qemu_x86_64
> > - x15
> > - x86
> > 
> > Test Suites
> > -----------
> > * build
> > * install-android-platform-tools-r2600
> > * kselftest
> > * libgpiod
> > * libhugetlbfs
> > * ltp-cap_bounds-tests
> > * ltp-commands-tests
> > * ltp-containers-tests
> > * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
> > * ltp-cve-tests
> > * ltp-dio-tests
> > * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
> > * ltp-filecaps-tests
> > * ltp-fs_bind-tests
> > * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
> > * ltp-fsx-tests
> > * ltp-hugetlb-tests
> > * ltp-io-tests
> > * ltp-ipc-tests
> > * ltp-math-tests
> > * ltp-mm-tests
> > * ltp-nptl-tests
> > * ltp-pty-tests
> > * ltp-sched-tests
> > * ltp-securebits-tests
> > * ltp-syscalls-tests
> > * ltp-timers-tests
> > * perf
> > * spectre-meltdown-checker-test
> > * v4l2-compliance
> > * kvm-unit-tests
> > * ltp-fs-tests
> > * ltp-open-posix-tests
> > * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
> > * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
> > 
> 

-- 
Linaro - Kernel Validation